I touched on this question, in a Comment at the bottom of a recent post;  however, I believe that the basic topic needs some clarification.  Just before the U. K. voted to “Leave” the European Union, the Prime Minister (at the time) and many British economists had cautioned that the long-term economic impact of leaving could be quite substantial.  Soon after that vote, some Britons began to doubt their decision, and a reported two million marched in London—asking to vote again.

Although the main stock index on the London Stock Exchange, the FTSE, dropped for the first two days after the Brexit vote, it then began to surge.  It is now up by 12.8% since then.  Most major global stock indices have likewise strengthened, and all three major U. S. stock indices have reached all-time highs.  But, where’s this strength coming from?

Last Thursday, the Bank of England and the Exchequer, the British central bank and treasury, respectively, announced a multi-pronged package of Monetary and Fiscal Policy actions, of substantial proportions.  This is the government’s attempt to confront the negative economic impact, which they expect the Brexit to cause.  At the same time, central banks around the world have maintained their base lending rates near, and some even below, zero.  Longer-term bond yields in most countries also remain near all-time lows.

Bond yields are an indicator of the strength of an economy.  When consumers fear a loss of their jobs, and business revenue is depressed, reduced bank loan demand follows.  That causes deposit rates to drop, and savers to suffer.  Additionally, the depressed commodity prices will also hurt the countries that depend on those revenues as a vital source of income.  And, at the same time, Corporate Earnings remain flat in the U. S, particularly  due to weak export demand.

It is usually advantageous for investors to establish balance in their portfolios, by spreading their investments among the “Asset Classes”—stocks, bonds and cash.  That strategy reduces the overall portfolio volatility, as stock and bond prices normally move counter to one another.  And cash obviously is intended to provide sufficient liquidity to meet unexpected financial needs.  But, with the stock and bonds markets currently both quote strong, undisciplined investors are straying from that proven strategy.  And this leads me to consider a potential answer to my initial question.

When investors shy away from current bond yields, they feel very little compulsion to tie their money up for years at those low rates.  (Sure, you can sell marketable bonds, if you need, or want, to take some money out; however, the price might be quite a bit lower than what you paid for them.) Accordingly, many investors might be enticed, by the rally in the stock markets, to binge on them.

Now, I’m not suggesting that the markets are gearing-up for a sharp fall-off anytime soon; however, I am pointing-out, that the recent stock market rally—after several corrections earlier this year—might come to an end, at some unforeseen time.  If you might be over-extended in stocks, be especially sure to check your portfolio frequently. (I will offer some suggestions as to what to look for in a subsequent post.)  For now, just keep in mind that: What goes up can come down, and vice versa.


, , , , ,

  1. #1 by Marvin Gerr on August 10, 2016 - 8:48 PM

    I have just come across your blog, through your hot link to it, in your comment about the NYT article about the Donald Trump SAP.
    In your section about why the stock market is so strong you mention the idea that what goes up can go down; in your opinion does an average investor
    Get any further protection for his or her
    capital by investing in the stock market
    100 % through mutual funds?

    • #2 by cheekos on August 10, 2016 - 9:30 PM

      Mr. Gerr, thanks for visiting my blog and commenting.

      There are perhaps 10,000 different mutual funds and, as one might expect, there is a wide range of past performance–from best-in-class (objective) to dismal. I had always found the Morningstar ratings to be a great measure of a particular mutuals fund’s consistent performance, over several years, and among its peers in its particular category–i.e. large cap growth, global bond, health care, etc.

      Another approach would be to consider exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which invest predominantly in a stock index. I use some individual stocks, and fill them in with some ETFs say, for health care, and a few mutual funds–again, usually to fill-in around the edges. Since I retired 4 1/2 years ago, and don’t know a particular persons Profile (which an Financial Advisor would need)–goals, financial particulars, risk tolerance, etc.–I don’t try to provide specific advice anymore.

      Over the years, I have written many posts on investing. You can search for a specific key word (upper right-hand corner) or click on the “Investing” hash to the right. Also, check the Sector SDDRs web site. They are ETFs that replicate specific industries in the S & P 500. For instance, the Technology ETF contains every tech company in the S & P 500. Also, even if you don’t use the ETYFs, the web site has a “Sector Tracker” link.

      Good luck.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: