BERNIE SANDERS—THE UNRULY PARTY GUEST WHO JUST WON’T GO HOME!

Senator Bernie Sanders (D/I-VT) has served his entire working life in Government Service—Mayor of Burlington, VT for ten years, U. S. House of Representatives for 16 years, and the U. S. Senate since 2007. Senator Sanders had always been registered as an Independent in the past.

When Sanders declared his Candidacy for President, on April 30 of last year, he decided to change his party affiliation to the Democratic Party.  Apparently, he thought that he had a stronger potential for winning with the backing of one of the two major parties.  However, he has often voiced his dissatisfaction ever since!

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, the Republicans (with Goldwater) and, then, the Democrats (with McGovern), respectively, suffered horrible losses in the General Election.  After those fiascos, both parties devised what are generally referred to as “Super-Delegates”.  These delegates are not chosen by the voters in the various state “primaries”; rather, they are appointed by virtue of their roles in the (Federal and State) Party Establishment.  The Super-Delegate concept was created specifically to provide a little “guidance” to the nomination process by each party, to prevent any future nightmares in the nominee selection process.

The rules for the primaries vary from state-to-state.  Some hold a traditional election, while others opt for the more time-consuming caucus.  In some states, only citizens who are registered with that particular party may cast a vote, while in states that have “Open Primaries”, any qualified voter may cast a vote, regardless of their part affiliation.  Here’s where Senator Sanders’ behavior turns sour!

Bernie Sanders is a charismatic speaker who attracts large, exuberant audiences, with a considerable appeal to some based on his over-riding theme—fighting for those suffering due to Income-Inequality.  His message seems to motivate many voters, regardless of which party they belong to; however, cross-over votes are not permitted in “closed’ (regular) primaries.  Likewise, since he does not have a historical affiliation within the Democratic Party, he hasn’t attracted many Democratic Super-Delegates either.

Approximately 81% of the delegates have already been chosen; however, Super-Delegates may change their votes at anytime up until the Democratic National Convention, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 25-28. Of the remaining primaries, Senator Sanders would need 90% of the remaining delegates, while Secretary Clinton needs only 90 more delegates—or 10% of those remaining—in order to win the nomination.

Among the remaining eight Democratic primaries, California (with 546 delegates), New Jersey (142), Puerto Rico (67) and the District of Columbia (45) have a combined total of 800 delegates, or 90% of the remaining 905.  And for Secretary Clinton, each of those four states has a high proportion of minority voters, groups that have turned-out to vote for her in large numbers in the earlier primaries.

Unfortunately, Senator Sanders doesn’t care to acknowledge the insanity of remaining in the race—although it is truly in his rights to do so—however, he is openly complaining about it at his “Rallies”.  The frustration of his supporters recently boiled-over into violence at the Nevada Democratic Convention.  Yet, Sanders refused to condemn the actions of his supporters.  Rather, his comment, which suggested that his campaign encouraged only non-violent change, included a big “But…”. And that’s when we went into implying that perhaps the Democratic National Committee might be the cause, with all of their biased rules.

Bernie Sanders has preferred not to admit that he knew the rules before he entered the primary process, and they have been in existence for years and years.  Also, changing rules within the middle of a contest would never be equitable to all involved.  Today, Sanders’ Campaign Manager, Jeff Weaver, avoided answering a direct question about the lack of a denunciation in a TV interview–or whether Senator Sanders’ comments might have contributed to the actions.  After Weaver ignored the question, he suggested that the Party had torpedoed the Sanders Campaign from the outset.

Advertisements

  1. #1 by MaryAnn Donahue on May 22, 2016 - 2:51 PM

    Good essay and summation of the current state of the primaries.

    • #2 by cheekos on May 22, 2016 - 3:42 PM

      Ms. Donahue, thanks for visiting my blog, and for adding a Comment. Senator Sanders seems to be a very nice person; however, Trumpet would surely prefer to face him in the General Election, rather than Secretary Clinton. Just think of how superficial any debates would be between those two!

  2. #3 by Charles Erickson on May 22, 2016 - 11:35 PM

    Sanders’ hypocrisy is baked in to his candidacy. He has excoriated the Dems for many years as a proud Independent, but he admits that he went to the Party for financial reasons. Ahh, that unholy dollar. His wife Jane got a pretty nice chunk of change for leaving Burlington College in the middle of a financial investigation involving her purchasing some land they couldn’t afford. Or something. Sadly, I’m starting to feel that if Sanders is so fast and loose with his insinuations and accusations, I can do the same. It looks to me as though Jane Sanders is a crook. And they won’t turn over their tax returns. Gotta be a reason, folks. These days, you hit a couple of buttons and there they are, collated, sorted and ready to go. Jane puts on this cute “busy Vermonter” apron, and wipes her brow and expounds upon the demands of her job and home life. I guarantee you, they are hiding something. Maybe it’s just that they make good money and take all the deductions. No problem, unless you are running as a socialist, and as such, your finances had better reflect socialism, not sneaky capitalism. Or you run the risk of being seen as a hypocrite. Yes, a hypocrite. Nor a very nice man.

    • #4 by cheekos on May 23, 2016 - 1:18 AM

      Mr. Erickson, thanks for visiting my blog and commenting. Although your comments about Senator Sanders might have similarities with my own beliefs, I certainly haven’t read anything about his wife, Jane, leaving the college–where she served as President, under questionable circumstances.

      Executives often do receive considerable pay-outs, when they leave any organization–from a combination of a pension, bonus due, Non=Compete, unused vacation and sick days, 401(k), etc. I’m fairly well-read, especially during Presidential Campaign years. So, I can neither agree nor dispute your comments regarding the circumstances under which Jane Sanders left the university.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: