On Thursday, Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank, announced a Stimulus Package of monetary tools, which are intended to nudge the economy upward.  The ECB is the monetary authority that regulates the Eurozone, the 19 European Union member nations that share the common currency, the Euro.  There is some question, however, as to whether monetary stimulus alone may be effective at the current minimal interest rate.  Additionally, growth can also be stifled may by inflation, which is at a negative 0.20%, considerably below the ECB’s goal of 2.0%.

The Gross Domestic Product for 2015 is expected to have grown by 1.8% for the E. U, while that of the Euro Area will be 1.5%.  In 2016, the GDP growth rate of the E. U. and Euro Area are projected to rise to 2.1% and 1.8%, respectively.  The financial markets responded in quite a haphazard manner following the ECB announcement. Initially, the EURO STOXX 50 Index, of 50 blue chip stocks from 12 Eurozone nations, rose sharply, but then it closed the day down by 1.8%.

The Stimulus Package contained a curious array of monetary tools, such as cutting the key lending rate to 0.00% and increasing the monthly bond-buying program.  The ECB controls only monetary policy; while fiscal tools—which some believe to be the preferred policy under such conditions—remain in the hands of each of the Euro member nations, respectively.

So far in the recovery, monetary tools have hardly encouraged banks to lend, or consumers and businesses to spend.  Government spending, such as on infrastructure projects–repairing highways, bridges, tunnels, etc–could put people to work quickly, increase consumer spending and, in turn, add to the tax revenue.

The E. U. seems to have an aversion for fiscal stimulus.  For the most part, that is probably due to the inability of the ECB to coordinate such actions on the part of the various member nations.  More specifically, however, once deficit spending especially were unleashed, the generally free-wheeling habits nations of the South and the more restrained ones of the North could probably never be able to reconciled again.  That inability to coordinate both fiscal and monetary policy, I believer, is why the Eurozone might never be able to truly live up to its original expectations.


, , ,

  1. #1 by rvette454 on March 14, 2016 - 3:33 PM

    Just wondering if Cheekos is a adherant to M.M.T. as a economic/ social science. For all the graphs, stats, theory and financial terms equated to economics by government and education economics is still a social science, decisions must be made that impact people more in day to day living, then markets and finance. It should be well known that private finances are not the same as government or Central Bank finances. I’m afraid that until people realise government’s sole authority is the betterment of all citizens that today’s common knowledge will prevail.

    • #2 by cheekos on March 14, 2016 - 4:13 PM

      rvette454, I am not an adherent of anything until I understand it. At this time, I am not aware of any proven business, economic or psychological concept(s) that go(es) by the name M.M.T. Perhaps you could fill me in or, at least, identify what these letters stand for. Also, please provide a web site or other link, providing some background information, if you can.

      Anyone who has read more than a couple of posts on this blog, I believe, understands that I am definitely a firm believer in rational thought, with logical explanations and, when possible, linked background information. Critical thinking is becoming more and more imperative, both today and, even more importantly, in the future.

    • #3 by cheekos on March 15, 2016 - 12:12 PM

      Granted, as I have written several times before, the finances of a government has little to do with how a family manages its budget. For instance, when the economy is in recession, and consumers and business drastically reduce spending, the national economy may fall into much deeper doldrums–a Depression. That’s when the government must increase spending even if it means running a deficit. On the other hand, during a booming economy, the government should build a surplus, which can help reduce the chances of an out-of-control overheating economy, and run-away inflation, on the up-side.

      That’s just like the squirrels: they gather excess food during the summer in order to see them through the winter’s scarcer food supply.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: