AN APPARENT LACK OF AUTHORITY IN FERGUSON, MO.

Last Saturday, an unarmed Black Man was shot and killed by a Police Officer, in Ferguson.  To date, as far as is publicly known, the Policeman was not arrested, but, is on paid administrative leave.  People have been forming in the streets each night since.

It might be important to note that Ferguson is a suburb of St. Louis and has a population of just over 21,000.  Approximately 65% of the Citizenry is Black; however, there are no Blacks in the Town Council, none in any of the key Town Leadership Positions and there are just three Black Officers on a Police Force of 53.  That lack of representation is undoubtedly a reason for the considerable frustration.

Although the Governor of Missouri, and both the Mayor and Police Chief of Ferguson, spoke at a Church Service (which was probably more of a call for calm than a Memorial Service), none of them have been visible since.  And apparently, no members of the Town Council have taken any action or made their presence known either.

The Police Department has asked for all public Religious or Protest demonstrations to disband by Sundown.  The point here is that the Police Department does not have the authority to declare a curfew; however, the Town Council and the Governor do.  So far, none of the elected State or Local Officials have taken any executive action whatsoever.

Tonight, on the fifth day after the killing of the unarmed Man, there had been, perhaps, 250 People who were just peacefully assembled in the area; however, they do not appear to be blocking traffic, taunting the Police or causing any damage.  There was some destruction by rioters one evening recently; however, there hasn’t apparently been any more since.  Today and tonight, the people in the area have been quite peaceful.

This evening (at 10:30 CDT), the Police Department has constantly been over-reacting–decked-out in SWAT gear, wearing full body armor and firing rubber bullets and tear gas canisters at People who are just standing on the sidewalk–at some distance from the Police.  In some cases, people are just out on their own lawns.  Oh, by the way, rubber bullets can kill and wound; so, don’t think that they are not real weaponry.

A retired Federal DEA Agent (and hostage negotiator) had stated several times that you don’t fire gas and rubber bullets, or patrol in tanks and full body armor, during a peaceful demonstration.  No doubt, some of the people who are just milling around came out of their nearby homes since the tear gas seeped inside.  The former DEA Agent pointed-out that several of the Police Officers had pointed their rifles at peaceful people in the crowd–something you just do not do, unless you intend to use it.  To me, that is outright intimidation.

Alarmingly, the police had also arrested people inside a McDonald’s, including two journalists with press credentials.  One, who was an Iraq War Veteran, said that the Police wore more body armor than he ever had in combat.  Additionally, some Police Officers asked the media to stop filming the action.  What did they wish to hide?

It is important to note that the Police do not make the Laws: they are there to “serve and protect”.  The Police Chief is hired by the Town Council to enforce the Laws that it makes.  The fact that there has not been a visible civilian leadership presence, making Laws and managing the situation, has enabled the frustration of the Black Population in Ferguson to move to a much higher level than needed.  Hopefully, a violent confrontation will not follow?

NOTE:  SWAT gear is even more intimidating that mere riot gear.  It is generally something that Police wear when there is definitely the potential for confronting an armed and violent person.

Advertisements

,

  1. #1 by maxcat06 on August 14, 2014 - 10:22 PM

    This is an observation, only, as I can’t back it by statistical fact, but it seems that more and more police departments now deck themselves out in military style gear. To the average citizen, it’s off-putting, and I’m not certain that it would be deterring or maddening to a criminal.

    • #2 by cheekos on August 15, 2014 - 5:39 AM

      MaxCat, you are completely right. The APC (armored personnel carrier) that was shown on television last night was a new version of something that the Army and Marines have been using for decades. The AK-47, developed by Mikhail Kalashnikov, was introduced to the Russian Army in 1947. I believe that rubber bullets were first used by the Israeli Army, and also go back decades. But these instruments definitely are intimidating. Unfortunately, some police forces don’t realize they will only challenge the crazy people out there to action, and cut them off from their best potential source of intelligence–the Citizenry.

      All that combat gear reminds me of an old Monty Python skit, where they go hunting tse-tse flies in “Darkest Africa–with a bazooka.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: